(Hello, for my Behavioral Change Procedures Coursework I will be sharing a series of questions I ask during our class’s Packback Discussions. This is 8 of 8)
In my work as a student analyst with a bright, late-diagnosed adult with mild ASD, the core challenge was profound stimulus generalization gone awry. A specific startle response (hand flapping, panicked breathing) had perfectly generalized from his primary caregiver’s modeled reactions to any unexpected noise across all settings (home, work, public places). This created a rigid, maladaptive response class to stress. This history effectively established the caregiver’s reaction as a powerful rule for how to behave under stress, leading to pervasive rule-governed behavior that was insensitive to changing environmental contingencies (Osnes and Adelinis, 2005). I tried an intervention targeting response generalization by using ACT/RFT to build psychological flexibility. We didn’t just shape one new calm behavior; we taught a repertoire of contextually adaptive responses (mindful noticing, diaphragmatic breathing, value-based action) to replace the single panic response. This was a process of expanding his behavioral options, a core aim of programming for generalization, and an attempt to shift behavior from being strictly rule-governed to being more sensitive to direct contingencies.
My question: For clients with long behavioral histories where entire classes of stimuli (stressors) control rigid classes of responses (panic), our generalization programming must be equally sophisticated. How can we systematically plan for stimulus and response generalization from the start when using verbal/relational interventions like ACT, rather than treating it as an afterthought? Furthermore, how can we ethically and effectively leverage group contingencies (like with a partner or family unit) not just to manage behavior, but to actively reprogram the social environmental support and maintain generalized emotional regulation? Does this shift the unit of intervention from the individual to the system?
References:
Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., & Roane, H. S. (2021). Handbook of Applied Behavior Analysis (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications.
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
Osnes, P. G., & Adelinis, J. (2005). Correspondence training, rule governance, generalization, and stimulus control: Connections or disconnections? Behavioral Development Bulletin, 12(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100560


Leave a comment